Using Candello data, researchers at Boston Children’s Hospital have demonstrated a link between patient handoff failures and malpractice cases. Further, they showed that, among cases involving a communication error, 77 percent of them could have been prevented by use of a structured handoff.

The handoff communication failures fell into several categories, explains Melissa Sundberg, MD, MPH, co-author and emergency medicine physician at Boston Children’s Hospital.

“Most of the failures involved information that was not passed on appropriately, but we further looked into whether it was related to a medication, radiology, lab study, or other information that was not passed on. They covered a broad range of specific types of information, but most of them involved an omission of some type when communicating with other providers or the patient and family.”1

Of note, the researchers found that the most common lapses in handoffs were the failure to communicate the severity of the illness and a contingency plan—the latter is particularly important for patients being cared for by family members at home.

I-PASS, a five-step patient handoff tool, explicitly addresses these two areas:

I Illness Severity
P Patient Summary
A Action List
S Situation Awareness and Contingency Planning
S Synthesis by Receiver

 

The authors hope that their research will help organizations develop support—both financial and clinical—for adoption of structured handoff protocols.

The Paper
Humphrey KE, Sundberg M, Milliren CE, Graham DA, Landrigan CP. Frequency and nature of communication and handoff failures in medical malpractice claims. Journal of Patient Safety. 2022;18(2):130-137. doi:10.1097/PTS.0000000000000937

Reference
1. Improving patient handoffs helps reduce malpractice claims. Healthcare Risk Management. March 1, 2022. Available at https://www.reliasmedia.com/articles/149130-improving-patient-handoffs-helps-reduce-malpractice-claims


Related Blog Posts

    Investing in Patient Safety

    Blog Post
    An article in today’s New York Time's suggests that malpractice reform may be best served by an investment in patient safety. At CRICO, we have been following just this model for decades by offering grant awards to stimulate research and patient safety interventions intended to improve the quality and safety of patient care. There are several clear examples of how these interventions have made a distinct impact on improving patient safety, including the I-PASS Study Group; just awarded the John M. Eisenberg Award for Innovation in Patient Safety and Quality.
    2016sympaka 066

    Mind the Gaps: Learning How to Avoid Miscommunication Pitfalls

    Blog Post
    Stories of patient harm resulting from a gap in communication were the inspiration for the 10th Annual CRICO Patient Safety Symposium, held at the Revere Hotel in Boston. 

    January Safety Salute | MedStar Health Creating a Just Culture

    Blog Post
    CRICO’s monthly Safety Salute recognizes a health care provider, leader, group, individual, or institution dedicated to and making positive improvements in patient safety.
X
Cookies help us improve your website experience.
By using our website, you agree to our use of cookies.
Confirm